This week has been incredibly busy at home and at Staffordshire Web Design HQ , so I’ve been unable to get a blog post up this week, sorry. I have an article that needs a polish and a proof read and I’ll post that tomorrow, all being well.

Although I’ve been mad busy for the last couple of weeks yesterday was the start of the first test between England and India and I’ve been following all the action on the BBC live text service. For those of you who are new to the blog (you are many in number, most welcome and appreciated) there is often some juvenile behaviour on the text that makes me smile.

Yesterday the conversation turned to TV Shows for Cricket starts. To give you an idea of what this is, Frasier in Leeds sent in,  “Idea for a TV show: “What’s Michael Holding” – A game show where contestants must work out what cricket related item is in the hands of the former legendary fast bowler with points deducted for every clue required.”

Not everyone’s cup of tea but this quintessentially English humour always tickles me and makes the day fly by. Some of the other better ones below.

@Emma_J_Turner, “Monty Panesar’s Flying Circus: Monty delivers a range of surreal risqué and innuendo-laden sketches.”

Rob, Lichfield, “How about ‘To the Manor Vaughan’. Unrequited love through the corridors of uncertainty in a Yorkshire stately home.”

From Tom, Nottingham, TMS inbox: “Ideas for TV programme – Saved by the Bell. Ian Bell as a super hero saving people’s lives using only a cricket bat, box and a bail.”
Note: Tom clearly doesn’t have kids as saved by the bell is a really famous American TV Kids show.

Some others suggestions that were listed without credit were,

“Indifferent Strokes” former England fast bowler Bob Willis looks back at batsman getting themselves out through poor shot selection. Each week following a particularly long rant over a badly executed reserve sweep or a top edged hook or such like, Sir Ian comes on and says “What you talkin’ bout Willis”

How about this geeky beauty, “Nasser Hussain’s semipermeable membrane’ The ex-England cricket captain discusses osmosis”
(My mate Jason Cooke will love this one)

“Goochy Coochy Coo, where Graham Gooch helps out a local maternity unit”. This made me smile so much. You really have to know what Graham Gooch looks and sounds like to get the full absurdity of this. Take a look at this photo of Graham Gooch up, you’ll have to find the audio on your own, but he’s often interviewed on Channel Five as he’s the current England batting coach

Have a good weekend, All
Phil

As you may know, I’m a fun loving person. In fact my wife thinks I’m a mushroom because I’m such a fun-guy. So here’s this weeks Friday Fun

Spaghetti Head Gets Driver’s License

My favourite bit of fun this week was the Austrian who is wearing a colander on his head in his driver’s license photo. According to the BBC Niko Alm first applied for the licence three years ago after reading that headgear was allowed in official pictures only for confessional reasons.

Niko said that the sieve was part of his religion as a member of the US Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Members if this church call themselves Pastafarians.

Niko Alm had to submit to a medical interview to check his mental fitness to drive, but eventually the license was issued in a blow to religious freedom and fun on a Friday everywhere.

Eh Up Duck, Doya Wan Spuds?

And I’m sure if I wasn’t married and I knew who the flip Mila Kunis was (an actress apparently) then I would be green with envy of the US soldier who used You Tube to ask out and got a yes.

It was an interesting approach to asking someone out and I am wondering if this will generate a craze of squaddies asking out famous people. If you can picture, if you will, the Sergeant’s Mess awash with budding actresses and half cut soldiers.

Although I’m on the cutting edge with technology, I’m personally a bit more traditional when it comes to affairs of the heart.

Just as I was wondering if I had anything good for a Friday Fun, a little beauty drops into my inbox.

This email has gone uber viral around the web and has even been picked up by the mainstream news media. It is being reported as being an email from Carolyn Bourne to her soon to be Daughter-in-law, Heidi Withers.

Caroline Bourne seems to have taken exception to Heidi’s lack of manners and Caroline totally takes her to task in the email over her rudeness. The email went viral after Heidi received the email and was so shocked when she got it she forwarded it on to some friends, who also forwarded it to a few friends and the rest as they say is history.

Being a dad of three with two in their teens I do have a bit of sympathy towards Caroline, but some of it is a way over the top mega rant (in a very upper class way) and fair warning to anyone thinking of telling someone off via email.

There are a few versions doing the rounds but I think this is the fullest. I cannot vouch for its accuracy. Sit back with a nice Friday cuppa, and enjoy.

##EMAIL FROM CAROLYN BOURNE##

It is high time someone explained to you about good manners. Yours are obvious by their absence and I feel sorry for you.

I am being kept awake – or woken early – by Edward [Freddie's father] who is so profoundly upset by your behaviour on your recent visit that he is depressed and anxious.

Unfortunately for Freddie, he has fallen in love with you and Freddie being Freddie, I gather it is not easy to reason with him or yet encourage him to consider how he might be able to help you. It may just be possible to get through to you though. I do hope so. Your behaviour on your visit to Devon during April was staggering in its uncouthness and lack of grace. Unfortunately, this was not the first example of bad manners I have experienced from you. If you want to be accepted by the wider Bourne family I suggest you take some guidance from experts with utmost haste. There are plenty of finishing schools around. You would be an ideal candidate for the Ladette to Lady television series. Please, for your own good, for Freddie’s sake and for your future involvement with the Bourne family, do something as soon as possible.

Here are a few examples of your lack of manners:

When you are a guest in another’s house, you do not declare what you will and will not eat – unless you are positively allergic to something.

You do not remark that you do not have enough food.

You do not start before everyone else.

You do not take additional helpings without being invited to by your host.

When a guest in another’s house, you do not lie in bed until late morning in households that rise early – you fall in line with house norms.

You should never ever insult the family you are about to join at any time and most definitely not in public. I gather you passed this off as a joke but the reaction in the pub was one of shock, not laughter.

I have no idea whether you wrote to thank [your future sister-in-law] for the weekend but you should have hand-written a card to her.

You should have hand-written a card to me. You have never written to thank me when you have stayed at Houndspool.

[Your future sister-in-law] has quite the most exquisite manners of anyone I have ever come across. You would do well to follow her example.

You regularly draw attention to yourself. Perhaps you should ask yourself why.

It is tragic that you have diabetes. However, you aren’t the only young person in the world who is a diabetic. I know quite a few young people who have this condition, one of whom is getting married in June. I have never heard her discuss her condition. She quietly gets on with it. She doesn’t like being diabetic. Who would? You do not need to regale everyone with the details of your condition or use it as an excuse to draw attention to yourself. It is vulgar.

As a diabetic of long standing you must be acutely aware of the need to prepare yourself for extraordinary eventualities, the walk to Mothecombe beach being an example. You are experienced enough to have prepared yourself appropriately.

No-one gets married in a castle unless they own it. It is brash, celebrity style behaviour.

I understand your parents are unable to contribute very much towards the cost of your wedding. (There is nothing wrong with that except that convention is such that one might presume they would have saved over the years for their daughters’ marriages.) If this is the case, it would be most ladylike and gracious to lower your sights and have a modest wedding as befits both your incomes.

One could be accused of thinking that Carolyn must be patting herself on the back for having caught a most eligible young man. I pity Freddie.

##END OF EMAIL##

Christmas is going to be fun in this household this year.

Have a good weekend, Phil